• Welcome to Poasters Computer Forums.
 

News:

Welcome to the ARCHIVED Poasters Computer Forums (Read Only)

Main Menu

Samsung's Solid State Disk

Started by scuzzy, March 22, 2006, 11:12 hrs

Previous topic - Next topic

scuzzy

Antec Performance TX640B Case | WinXP Pro SP3 & Win7 64-bit | Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R | Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 Wolfdale LGA 775 3.16GHz Dual-Core | 8GB (4x2GB) PC6400 G-Skill RAM | eVGA 7600GT 256MB PCI-E | 74GB WD Raptor SATA 16MB Cache | 74GB WD Raptor SATA 8MB Cache | 320GB Seagate Barracuda SATA 16MB Cache | External 640GB WD Caviar SATA 32MB Cache | Sony DRU-V200S DVD/RW | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 500W | Samsung SyncMaster 2494 (24") LCD Monitor | LG Flatron W2361V (23") LCD Monitor

Carskick

#1
I knew this would happen eventually. I'm glad it is finally catching on, as our traditional hard drives are very archaic. How nice would a laptop be whose only moving parts were fans and the DVD drive? The speed and electrival efficiencies merely are icing.

However, at $500, One could buy 4 200GB hard drives. Even a 15k or 20k RPM SCSI drive would be a better deal, and just as fast, if not faster, but would consume more electricity.
Athlon64 X2 3800+ Machester@2.45Ghz, 4x1GB A-DATA PC3200@204(2.5-3-3-6), XFX 8800GT, ASUS A8N5X NF4, Antec 300 case, Antec EarthWatts 650w, 640GB 16MB and 200GB 8MB 7200RPM SATA WD HDDs, NEC3540, NEC3550, Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate<br />Photos: http://picasaweb.google.com/Carskick

saoirse

#2
The technology behind the idea isn't new.  Cenatek have been producing these for a while, but with limited capacity (4 GB) running on the PCI bus.

QuoteEven a 15k or 20k RPM SCSI drive would be a better deal, and just as fast, if not faster, but would consume more electricity

Access times for these SSDs are far shorter than that of an SCSI drive.  Cenatek quotes just 0.6?s.  It'll be interesting to see the read/write data rate of the higher capacity Samsung discs.

Bill

I'd like to see this technology applied to desktops.  Not as inexpensive as conventional but faster, and quieter.
Not everyone needs huge capacity.


Bill
Antec 3700 | Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R | Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale 3.0GHz | 4 GB (4x1GB) DDR2 PC 5300 Kingston RAM | Antec NeoPower 550W | eVGA GeForce 9500GT 1GB 128 bit PCI Express 2.0 | Intel SSD X25-M 80GB | VelociRaptor 150GB | WD 80GB 7200rpm |Samsung 22x SATA Burner |Windows 7 32-bit

Neon

#4
Quote from: Bill on April 05, 2006, 10:54 hrs
I'd like to see this technology applied to desktops.  Not as inexpensive as conventional but faster, and quieter.
Not everyone needs huge capacity.


Bill

RAM Disks have been available for some time. They are mundo expensive compared to disk drives. Note that disk drives have increased in capacity (if not reliability) a lot in the past decade. It's hard to beat them for capacity/price.

Gigabyte iRAM
Area 64 project|Asus SK8N|nForce3 Pro 150 chipset|AMD Athlon 64 FX-51|2x 512MB Kingston HyperX PC3200R|eVGA GeForce 6800GT|WD Caviar SE 1200JD SATA|Plextor PX-708A 8x DVD+R|Plextor PX-116A 16x DVD-ROM|Lian Li PC-60H1S|Antec TruePower 430W ATX|WinXP x64 edition

Carskick

Quote from: saoirse on April 05, 2006, 10:24 hrs

Access times for these SSDs are far shorter than that of an SCSI drive.  Cenatek quotes just 0.6?s.  It'll be interesting to see the read/write data rate of the higher capacity Samsung discs.

Yes, access times will definitely be better, but the transfer rate may still be as good or better on the SCSI drives. Fragmentation will be much less important on a flash block, as shown here.
Athlon64 X2 3800+ Machester@2.45Ghz, 4x1GB A-DATA PC3200@204(2.5-3-3-6), XFX 8800GT, ASUS A8N5X NF4, Antec 300 case, Antec EarthWatts 650w, 640GB 16MB and 200GB 8MB 7200RPM SATA WD HDDs, NEC3540, NEC3550, Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate<br />Photos: http://picasaweb.google.com/Carskick